Legal Opinion
National Premium Budget Plan Corp. v. Siegel Agency, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1972No. Docket 12018PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorradaile, J.
Plaintiff, a financing company, filed suit against the defendants to collect certain unearned premiums on automobile insurance policies that were cancelled. Siegel Agency Inc. filed a third-party complaint and brought in the Davises and the Grants as third-party defendants. After a five day non-jury trial, the court held in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $15,771.16 plus interest, and against the Davis-Grant Agency and the Cadillac Mutual Insurance Company. The court found no cause of action as to the Siegel Agency and the third-party defendants.
Cadillac Mutual Insurance Company appeals the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Spilka v. South America Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- State Investment Co. v. Cimarron Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haggar v. OlfertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Comerica Bank-Ann Arbor, N.A. v. Sutherland (In Re Duke Roofing Co.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- MacKlin v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Automated Systems, Inc. v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Devitt v. QuirkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981