Legal Opinion
Taney v. Hodson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1927No. Nos. 25,775, 25,776PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
These actions were brought to recover on guaranties of payment for goods to be purchased pursuant to written contracts between plaintiff and the purchasers, who will hereafter be referred to as retailers. The guaranties were unlimited as to time and amount and made no provision for their termination by the guarantors. The answer alleged that plaintiff made an unreasonable and unwarranted use of the guaranties in permitting the retailers to become indebted in the amounts sued for, namely, $2,426.59 in one case, and $1,804.60 in the other.
The cases were tried by the court without a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Cargill Commission Co. v. SwartwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Lehigh Coal & Iron Co. v. ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- American Engine Co. v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Bradshaw v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Midway National Bank v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Wojtkowski v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Thayer v. DuffySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.