Legal Opinion
Scott v. Beth Israel Medical Center Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*935OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles Edward Ramos, J.
In motion sequence 10,1 plaintiff Dr. Scott moves pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order requiring defendants Beth Israel Medical Center and Continuum Health Partners Inc. (collectively BI) to return to plaintiff all e-mail correspondence between plaintiff and his attorney.2 In motion sequence 11,3 BI moves pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order barring plaintiff from obtaining discovery from BI concerning a governmental or regulatory investigation of BI.
The court presumes familiarity with the background of the case which is set forth in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rossi v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Scott v. Beth Israel Medical Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Moya v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pure Power Boot Camp v. Warrior Fitness Boot CampDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Holmes v. Petrovich Development Co. LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Aventa Learning, Inc. v. K12, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- Orbit One Communications, Inc. v. Numerex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.