Legal Opinion
In re Damon R.
New York City Family Court
Decided September 30, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*381OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard D. Huttner, J.
Respondent seeks an order pursuant to CPL 710.30 (subd 3), precluding any identification at trial by the complainant of the respondent.
On June 22, 1980, respondent was arraigned in criminal court, Kings County. The matter was subsequently removed to Family Court, and respondent was arraigned on July 1, 1980. Defense counsel was never served a notice pursuant to CPL 710.30.
CPL 710.30 (subds 1 and 2) provides that notice “must be served within fifteen days after arraignment and before trial”. The statute permits late service of such notice, only upon a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re Gregory W.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. SpruillNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. FortSyracuse City Court · 1981
- People v. ClarkeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1983
- In re Shannon G.New York Family Court · 1984
- In re Miguel M.New York City Family Court · 1985