Legal Opinion

Haslam v. Paulsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1964No. 9938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

In an action for personal injury the plaintiff obtained a verdict for $50,000 general and $558.80 special damages. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for'a new trial, from which the plaintiff seeks to appeal.

The right of appeal is from final judgments. Utah Const. Art. VIII, Sec. 9; Rule 72(a), U.R.C.P. The order granting a new trial is not a final judgment, it hut sets aside the verdict and places the parties in the same position as if there had been no previous trial. White v. Pease, 15 Utah 170, 49 P. 416; Bear River Valley Orchard Company v. Hanley, 15 Utah…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. White v. PeaseUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Klinge v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bear River Valley Orchard Co. v. HanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kerr v. City of Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wood v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Peterson v. Hyundai MotorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  5. Smith v. ShreeveUtah Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API