Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Chamness
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 6, 1933No. 1155PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKMAN, Chief Justice.
This suit arose out of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Appellee A. L. Chamness was the employee, George Christie the employer, and appellant New Amsterdam Casualty Company the insurer. The employee sustained an injury to his left eye on the 26th day of March, 1930, in Eastland county, from the effects of which the eyeball was removed a few days later. Claim for compensation therefor was filed with the Industrial Accident Board on the 26th day of October, 1931. From an award by the Industrial Accident Board, each party appealed to the district court, where the causes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holloway v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. McGradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Zurich General Accident & Fidelity Ins. Co. v. WalkerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Johnson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Safety Casualty Co. v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.