Succession of King
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentBarnette, Judge
(dissenting) :
The concept of post-demise alimony is foreign to the laws and jurisprudence of Louisiana. My reluctant willingness to accept the concept for application in the instant case as opposed to the unwillingness of my colleagues, who form the majority, to do so, is the basic point of difference between us. As I see it we are here called upon under the full faith and credit clause *590in Article IV, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States to recognize and enforce an obligation sanctioned by the laws of Florida and imposed by a court of that State. It is our duty to do so, even…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cortina v. CortinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- North v. NorthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.