Legal Opinion

Mortenson v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 8, 1995No. 92 C 2710, 92 C 2711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

On February 10, 1988, Lee N. Mortenson (“Mr. Mortenson”) and James M. Fawcett (“Mr. Fawcett”) were assessed a 100 percent penalty in the amount of $694,887.42 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672. Messrs. Mortenson and Fawcett subsequently brought these lawsuits against the United States government seeking a refund and abatement of the penalty, and the government brought counterclaims to recover the unpaid portion of the penalty. The government now brings this motion in limine to exclude evidence from the trial of these consolidated cases. For the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Mary Rem, Syma Lichter, and Nathan Hanfling, as Executors of the Estate of Henry Rem, Gerard RemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. In Re Branagan, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In Re Sunrise Paving, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API