Legal Opinion

Lee v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1997No. C.A. 92-162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

This is an action filed by the plaintiff taxpayer, Ivor J. Lee, II, to recover a tax penalty assessed against him by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) of the United States of America, the defendant in the action. The government has impleaded Thomas Hockran and Sulo Maynard Lahti Jr. as third-party defendants.

The government has filed a motion in li-mine to exclude certain evidence that the plaintiff and the third-party defendants (collectively, the “taxpayers”) intend to introduce at trial.

I. Background

HLH Drilling, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Raymond DufresneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Quattrone Accountants, Inc. And Philip P. Quattrone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. John A. Thibodeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. In the Matter of Ribs-R-Us, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. United States v. LynchDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API