Legal Opinion
Geh v. Mezey
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1960Published
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge H. Vinette, J.
There are three motions in the above-entitled action. By notice of motion dated September 14, 1960, the plaintiff moved for an order directing that a commission issue in this action for the examination of the plaintiff in Australia. The moving affidavit submitted by one of the attorneys for the plaintiff alleges substantially as follows: that the plaintiff is a resident of Australia; that the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff his promissory note in writing wherein he promised to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 600 pounds 12 months after July 7, 1956; that the consideration for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1953
- Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Coleman v. Pauma Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Georgopoulous v. Beach Haven Apartments, No. 3, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Konigsberg v. KonigsbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.