Legal Opinion

Konigsberg v. Konigsberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 26, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The' plaintiffs failed to present any valid reason or excuse for the delay of more than two years after joinder of issue in bringing the cause on for trial and failed to set forth any facts showing merit in their action. In the circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution {Gallagher v. Clafington, Inc., 7 A D 2d 627; Brassner Mfg. Co. v. Consolidated Edison Co., 1 A D 2d 840; Moebus v. Paul Tishman Co., 5 A D 2d 786; Mancino v. City of New York, 1 A D 2d 830; Fast v. Meenan Oil Co., 1 A D 2d 889; Taylor v.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geh v. MezeyNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API