Legal Opinion

In the Matter of McNeely

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1987No. 59829Published

1Opinion of the Court

734 P.2d 1294 (1987)

In the Matter of Suzanne McNEELY, an alleged deprived child.

Daniel C. McNEELY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Angeline R. DELMER, formerly McNeely, Defendant-Appelee.

No. 59829.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 17, 1987.

Thomas A. Williams, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Don Cooke, Messrs. Miskovsky & Cooke, Oklahoma City, for defendant-appellee.

OPALA, Justice.

In Davis v. Davis[1] we held 10 O.S. 1981 § 1130[2] to be a public-law/state-action statute whose grounds are invocable only by the state. The question here is whether the subsequent amendment of that statute, 10…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kauger; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kauger.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. McCracken v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Griggs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API