Legal Opinion

Lucy v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1904No. Nos. 14,108—(166)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Redwood county, Webber, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action in claim and delivery, which was dismissed on trial after plaintiff had rested, and the latter appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts are as follows: One Dittbenner was a merchant owning ■a stock of general merchandise and doing business at Revere, this state. He was considerably in debt, and unable to meet his obligations, and executed and delivered to plaintiff in this action a trust deed of all his stock of merchandise,, all his accounts, bills receivable, and *275certain' real property owned by him, in consideration that plaintiff should take possession of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. In re the Assignment of BirdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Damaskus v. McCarty-Johnson Heating & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Boyum v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Mitchell v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Johnson v. BruzekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. McConnellUtah Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API