Legal Opinion

Hallowes v. Bedard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 30, 2004No. 5D03-3184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, W., J.

Hallowes appeals from a final judgment rendered after a non-jury trial, which denied his request for an award of attorney fees against Ronald and Barbara Bedard, based on quantum meruit. Hallowes represented the Bedards in prosecuting their claim against First Union Securities and others for investment losses, beginning with reviewing their letter claim form and handling the arbitration of their claim under NASD (National Association of Securities Dealers) Code of Arbitration Procedure through arbitration, a process that lasted a little over one year. The trial judge ruled that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA v. PoletzSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Osteen v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. DH Blair & Co., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. LOVE PGI PARTNERS, LP v. SchultzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vance v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. v. Guardianship of McKeanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Vance, Maria Henry v. Commercial MediationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API