Legal Opinion

Vance v. Gallagher

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 30, 2008No. 06-3775PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Maria Vance and her attorney, Daryl Brown, entered into “Attorney/Client Contingency Agreement” that set forth a fee schedule and other terms that would govern Brown’s representation of Vance in litigation involving various trusts. Before the litigation was completed, Vance terminated Brown, and the successor of Brown’s *535law firm, Commercial Mediation Group, brought a claim for attorney’s fees under the quantum meruit theory. The district court awarded Commercial Mediation Group a quantum meruit recovery of $946,078.16. Commercial Mediation Group appeals.

I

Maria Henry Vance brought suit in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Colleen Baer v. First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Appeal of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. v. James R. AntonionoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Havoco of America, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, and Elmer C. Hill, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lukis v. Whitepages IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Monco v. Zoltek CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Monco v. Zoltek CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Samuel T. RowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API