People v. Bell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unani*932mously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree (Penal Law § 170.30), criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 165.40), and criminal solicitation in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 100.05 [1]). County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress a stolen and forged check seized from defendant’s person, because police at that point had probable cause to arrest defendant (see, People v Cox, 177 AD2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BongarzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. FontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BurrowsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. McKinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. AnzaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Bell v. MurrayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004