Shah v. the Mississippi Bar
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentWaller, Chief Justice
¶ 17. I disagree that Shah has met the requirements to warrant reinstatement. Aside from his own testimony, the only evidence offered to show Shah’s general reputation is a “Petition in Support of Petitioner’s Petition to be Readmitted to the Mississippi State Bar” signed by fifty-three individuals, only two of whom Shah knew personally. Furthermore, Shah has yet to accept full responsibility for his actions. Throughout the Bar’s deposition, Shah continued to dispute material facts surrounding the prior incidences of misconduct that eventually led to his disbar-*1279xnent. For these reasons, I do…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re Reinstatement of HollemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re McGuireMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Reinstatement of TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re SheltonMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.