Doneburg v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLMAN, Justice.
Appellant Ellis Allen Doneburg appeals his conviction for the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. In his sole point, Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
On January 10, 2000, Appellant was charged by information with driving while intoxicated on December 15, 1999. The information included an enhancement count alleging Appellant had an open container of an alcoholic beverage (whiskey) in his immediate possession during the offense.
At trial, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Surredin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- Brent Gowe Gates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Joshua Allen Schoppman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Joshua Allen Schoppman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- in the Interest of J.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006