Melnick v. Khoroushi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A default is considered intentional when a party takes no steps to vacate it until after judgment has been entered against him (see Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568, 569 [1997]). Despite having been afforded ample opportunity to avoid the entry of default judgment, plaintiffs failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious defense to the counterclaims asserted by defendants (see Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda. v Farber, 34 AD3d 230 [2006]).
Under the circumstances, this appeal is frivolous. Sanctions should be imposed, and the responding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roussodimou v. ZafiriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Tsabbar, D.D.S. v. AuldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda. v. FarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of TWU Counseling Ctr. Inc. v. New York City Tax Commn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022