Legal Opinion

Melnick v. Khoroushi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

A default is considered intentional when a party takes no steps to vacate it until after judgment has been entered against him (see Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568, 569 [1997]). Despite having been afforded ample opportunity to avoid the entry of default judgment, plaintiffs failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious defense to the counterclaims asserted by defendants (see Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda. v Farber, 34 AD3d 230 [2006]).

Under the circumstances, this appeal is frivolous. Sanctions should be imposed, and the responding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roussodimou v. ZafiriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Tsabbar, D.D.S. v. AuldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Granibras Granitos Brasileiros, Ltda. v. FarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of TWU Counseling Ctr. Inc. v. New York City Tax Commn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API