Roche v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are plaintiffs’ and defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. 1 Aso before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to strike documents. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Furthermore, plaintiffs’ motion to strike documents is denied as moot.
I. FACTS
Plaintiffs are former Deputy Fire Commissioners employed by the City of Chicago (“City”). Plaintiffs Foley and Roche, who reached the age of sixty-three in the years 1984 and 1987…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin v. State of Wisconsin, Tommy G. Thompson and Donald J. HanawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Gang v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Jirus v. City of BerwynDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Chakonas v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Thomas ROCHE, William Foley and Joseph Brichetto, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New York StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- 66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1164, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,406 Nestor Chakonas v. City of Chicago, City of Chicago Police Department, Leroy Martin, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.