Kliger v. Rosenfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Samuel Bosenfeld and-another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of -the plaintiff, entered in the-office of the clerk of the county of .New York on the 29th day of- August, 1906, upon the decision of the court rendered after- . a trial at the ¡New York Special'Term confirming the report of a referee appointed to take an account between the parties.'
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, J.:
An interlocutory judgment directing that the defendants account, concerning the partnership business which was. adjudged to exist between them and the plaintiff was entered April 10, 1905, and a referee was appointed to take and state the account. - On the coming in of his report numerous exceptions were filed to his' findings, but they were overruled and judgment on them ordered, and from such judgment the defendants appeal.
On the hearing before the referee the ■ plaintiff did not ask and the referee did not direct that the defendants. file an account, but the plaintiff at once…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Symmers v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Cronk v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- In re Federal Union Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
- Pierce v. FennoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928