Legal Opinion

Cronk v. Crandall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Sep abate appeals by the defendants Clayton G. Landis and another, as executors, etc., and others, and by the defendant Harriet E. Fiss, as administratrix, etc., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant Margaret I. Crandall, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 7th’day of January, 1909, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Kruse, J.:

This action involves a partnership accounting. Crandall & Co. was a partnership firm doing business in the city of Buffalo. On the 14th day of February, 1894, it was composed of Adelbert D. Cronk,' the plaintiff, Margaret I. Crandall, William Fiss and John B. Boerr, each owning an undivided one-fourth interest in the firm property. On or about December 31, 1898, Fiss and Boerr purchased Cronk’s interest, so that they (Fiss and Boerr) each then had a three-eighths interest in the firm. On the 26th day of July, 1901, Boerr died, leaving a last will and testament, in which Fiss was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blood v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Leserman v. . BernheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Kliger v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Fleischmann v. FleischmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riley v. LarocqueNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lawrence v. CowperthwaitNew York Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API