Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commonwealth Acceptance Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 27, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1. The master was not obliged to report any of the evidence under the terms of the order of reference, which tracked the language set out in Form B of Rule 86 of the Superior Court, as amended effective June 1, 1970, and as in effect until July 1, 1974. Jones v. Wayland, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 725, 729 (1976), S.C., 374 Mass. 249 (1978). See now Rule 49, § 2, of the Superior Court (1974). 2. Nor was the master obliged to make summaries of the evidence, because there had been no compliance with the requirements of the second sentence of the second paragraph of Rule 90 of the Superior Court (1954).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Milbank v. J. C. Littlefield, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Chopelas v. ChopelasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Goldman v. KaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tracy v. CurtisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API