Nassar v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
Appellants pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit aggravated unlawful possession of marihuana 1 , a first degree felony, after the trial court set their original convictions, based on pleas to non-offenses, aside. By four identical points of error, each appellant contends that the Double Jeopardy Clause precluded the trial court from trying them again and, alternatively, that they are entitled to credit for time previously spent on probation. We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
In January, 1988, each appellant was indicted separately for an alleged August 22, 1987,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte HerronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Clifton Fransaw v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Valentine v. Castillo, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1999
- Tackett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Hern v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Gallemore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.