Legal Opinion

People v. Sterling

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for an order striking from defendant’s answer a certain paragraph of its denials and all of the *770matter pleaded and set forth as second, third and fourth separate answers and defenses is upon the grounds that all of said matter is irrelevant, and may tend to prejudice and embarrass the fair trial of the action, and also that the same is insufficient in law.

This action is brought to recover penalties for alleged violations of section 61-a of the Conservation Law. The matter plaintiff seeks to strike from the defendant’s answer denies that the maintenance of advertising signs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vose v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. People v. Brooklyn, Flatbush & Coney Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Welch v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Demarest v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. McCargo v. . JergensNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SterlingNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API