Legal Opinion
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Meyer
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided May 24, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, Part II, in an action by motion for judgment for money. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
*660Designating the parties as they were designated in the trial court, plaintiff’s decedent was killed in a crossing accident on April 15, 1925, in the town of' Mineral. An action by motion 'for the recovery of' damages was instituted by the administratrix. In due time it came on for trial. The jury returned a verdict in the sum of $8,600.00, which verdict was confirmed by a judgment of the trial court. To it appropriate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washington Southern Railway Co. v. LaceySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Washington & Old Dominion Railway Co. v. Zell's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Richmond Locomotive Works v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Etheridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schuerholz v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Funderburk v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Virginian Railway Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad v. ParkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Southern Railway Co. v. WhetzelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.