Legal Opinion

Hugh Q. Riley v. FCA US LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 4, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00958Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HUGH Q. RILEY, CASE NO. 3:24 CV 958 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II FCA US LLC, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant. ORDER INTRODUCTION Currently pending before the Court in this employment discrimination case is Defendant FCA US LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 22). Plaintiff Hugh Q. Riley opposes (Doc. 24) and Defendant replies (Doc. 26). Jurisdiction is proper under

28 U.S.C. §§ 1331

and 1367. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff began…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API