United States v. Smalling

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant Kwan Miller, proceeding pro se, appeals the denial of his post-judgment motions to reduce his restitution obligation and to amend his presen-tence investigation report (“PSR”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history of the case, and, issues on appeal.

The issues raised by this appeal are pure questions of law, which we review de novo. United States v. Barresi, 361 F.3d 666, 671 (2d Cir.2004). Although the district court did not explain its reasons for *4denying Miller’s motions, we may affirm “on any ground which finds…