Legal Opinion

United States v. Algoma Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1939No. Nos. 245—247PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Decision of these cases turns on the question whether certain contracts for the sale of timber on land of the Klamath Indian Reservation in Oregon, executed by the Superintendent of the Klamath Indian School by authority of an Act of Congress, are contracts of the United States upon which suits may be maintained in the Court of Claims.

Section 7 of the Act of Congress of June 25,1910, c. 431, 36 Stat. 855, 857, provides that the “timber on unallotted lands of any Indian reservation may be sold under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior, and the proceeds from such sales…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. Shoshone Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API