Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Baugh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1998No. 9412-08281; CA A91803PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This appeal arises out of a breach of contract action. The dispute at trial centered on the validity and enforceability of a promissory note that plaintiff, an attorney, negotiated with defendants to secure payment for plaintiffs legal services. At the time the note was negotiated, plaintiff represented a corporation in which defendants were the sole shareholders. By signing the note, defendants personally obligated themselves to pay for the legal services to the corporation. Plaintiff sued to enforce the note; defendants, by various affirmative defenses, alleged that the note was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hammond v. Central Lane Communications CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Curtis v. MRI IMAGING SERVICES IIOregon Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. McCulloch v. Price Waterhouse LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Bennett v. BaughOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Giulio v. BV CENTERCAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  5. In re CopeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API