Legal Opinion

Dumas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 29, 1995No. CR-94-2176PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, John Dumas, appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant, an inmate at Holman Prison in Atmore, was disciplined for assaulting a person associated with the Department of Corrections, a violation of disciplinary rule 29. He was punished by loss of store, telephone, and visitation privileges, and was ordered to serve 32 days in segregation.

The appellant maintained that he was denied his due process rights. The United States Supreme Court in Wolff v. McDonnell,418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.E.2d 935 (1974), held that before an inmate may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Summerford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McConico v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. Austin v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API