Mayfield v. State

This is this Court’s second review of this case. Originally, the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the defendant’s conviction on the ground that Ala.Code 1975, § 32-10-6, was constitutionally defective, because, that court wrote, the accused could not learn whether he had been charged with a misdemeanor or a felony until after he had been convicted and sentenced. Mayfield v. State, 545 So.2d 87 (Ala.Crim.App.1986). Upon review, this Court reversed and remanded the case to the Court of Criminal Appeals on the authority of Newberry v. State, 493 So.2d 995 (Ala.1986). Mayfield v. State, 545…