Legal Opinion

United States v. Adan Castillo-Roman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1985No. 85-2080PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case is an appeal to review the adequacy of procedures followed by the district court in sentencing the defendant to four years in the custody of the Attorney General. Because we find that the appellant’s sentencing did not rest on any factual inaccuracies, and that the district court did not materially err in conducting the sentencing hearing, we affirm and remand only to allow the district court to attach a copy of the sentencing transcript to the presentence report in compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(3)(D).

I

In June of 1984, the appellant Adan…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank Hayes, Dorothy Foley Hayes and Alice BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Robert AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Juan Jose VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. James Michael StephensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Ray LaugaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Angel Fernandez-AnguloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Esau Juarez-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Jack Eugene Harrison, United States of America v. Gary Don JeterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API