Legal Opinion
Jenad, Inc. v. Village of Scarsdale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover money paid by the plaintiff, a builder and developer, to the defendant Village of Searsdale, pursuant to an alleged illegal provision of the Village Code adopted pursuant to section 179-1 of the Village Law, and to declare such provision null and void, the .plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 1, 1963, which denied its motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the former Rules of Civil Practice, and which granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order reversed, with $10…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Mayor, Etc., of New York v. . SonnebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Shepherd v. Mount Vernon Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- MacMurray v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlann Shores, Inc. v. City of Gulf Breeze, Circuit Court of the 1st Judicial Circuit of Florida, Santa Rosa County1966
- City of New York v. 17 Vista AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Cable Television of Rochester, Inc. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1975