Legal Opinion
Denison Cotton Mill Co. v. McAmis
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 5, 1919No. 79-2857PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Sixth-Supreme Judicial District. Action by J. O. McAmis against the Den-ison Cotton Mill Company. There was a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (176 S. W. 621), affirming a judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStrong, J.
The plaintiff, J. O. McAmis, recovered judgment in the district court against the Denison Cotton Mill Company, which was affirmed by the Court of Civil. Appeals. 176 S. W. 621. We adopt the iol-*443lowing statement of the ease made by the Court of Civil Appeals: >
“The action is by appellee for damages for personal injuries. As an employé of the mill company appellee,.along with about eight others, was assisting in roofing a warehouse with a material known as asbestos roofing. The work was being done under the direction and immediate supervision of the mill company’s superintendent and foreman.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Moss v. Sanger Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Dillingham v. ScalesTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Chicago, Rock Island & Texas Railway Co. v. LangstonTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Long v. ValleauSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. StarlingTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Tabor v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Southern Underwriters v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Southwestern Life Ins. Co. v. PowersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.