Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & Holbert
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRobert O. Brink, J.
This is a motion for the resettlement of two orders entered on August 3, and September 26, 1962. Petitioner herein, brought on a motion for a stay of arbitration pursuant to section 1458-a of the Civil Practice Act on March 16, 1962, The petitioner in that motion presented two grounds for granting the stay: (3) The Statute of Limitations had expired prior to respondents’ filing of a demand for arbitration; (2) the respondents had failed to file a sworn statement with the insurance company setting forth the occurrence of the accident.
A decision was handed down on August 1, 1962 in which the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Fox v. . MatthiessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Pfeffer v. Buffalo Railway Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
- Fox v. MatthiessenNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Jellinghaus v. New York InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1983