Allstate Insurance v. Talbot
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AGUILAR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION:
The Court has before it plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and declaration that Allstate Insurance Company has no duty to defend or indemnify Floyd Talbot with respect to the lawsuit filed against him by Jane Doe, et al. in state court. The Court has received, read and considered all the papers submitted on the matter and in addition has heard the argument of counsel. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court HEREBY GRANTS the motion for the reasons set out below.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
T…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Hooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. McCranieDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Commercial Union Insurance Companies v. Sky, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Sena Ex Rel. Sena v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.