Legal Opinion

Sena Ex Rel. Sena v. Travelers Insurance

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided June 11, 1992No. 91-1075-M CivilPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MECHEM, Senior District Judge.

This matter came on for consideration on the motion for summary judgment brought by defendant Travelers Insurance Company (hereinafter “Travelers”). Having considered the motion, response, and reply, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, I find that defendant’s motion is well taken and is hereby granted. Plaintiff’s complaint against insured Edward Ur-ioste does not allege facts tending to show an occurrence covered by Mr. Urioste’s policy with Travelers. I find no triable fact issues as to breach of contract, breach of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Richardson Engineering Co. v. William L. Crow Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Farm Fire & Cas. v. CompupayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Smith v. Animal Urgent Care, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API