Legal Opinion

Hinson v. M/V CHIMERA

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 24, 2009No. Civil Action 08-4382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

KURT D. ENGELHARDT, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability” (Rec. Doc. 19). Considering the parties’ submissions and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent stated herein.

I. Summary Judgment Standard

Pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beech v. FV WishboneDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API