Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Dr. David Kennedy Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Motion to continue a temporary injunction until the trial of the action.
1Opinion of the CourtBetts, J.
This is a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction until the trial of the action.
Such litigation has been had between these parties that the Appellate Division has decided that the defendant has the right to first open all letters addressed to plaintiff by two separate forms of address, i. e., “ Dr. David Kennedy, Rondout, N. Y.,” and “ Dr. D. Kennedy, Kondout, N. Y.” Kennedy Corporation v. Kennedy, 436 App. Div. 599.
By direction of the postmaster at Kingston, approved by the post-office department, letters addressed to plaintiff in many other .and different forms than the two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hazard v. . CaswellNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelite Products, Inc., and R. C. Martin v. Alvin J. Binzel, Jr., Trading as Kelite Products of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Chapman v. Mills & GibbDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- United States v. ThayerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1907
- Kelite Products, Inc., and R. C. Martin v. Alvin J. Binzel, Jr., Trading as Kelite Products of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955