Legal Opinion

Arbuckle v. Biederman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1883No. 9987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was a suit by the appellees against the appellant to recover damages for false representations and fraud in reference to a coal mine which the appellees were seeking to lease, and, relying on such representations, did lease from the appellant on the second day of October, 1879.

The suit was commenced in March, 1880. The defendant filed an answer in three paragraphs, of which the first was a general denial and the second and third were counterclaims. The plaintiffs answered the counter-claims in two paragraphs, to wit, the general denial, and a special answer, to-which the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Sherlock v. AllingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richburger v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Alfred Shrimpton & Sons, Ltd. v. KeyesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API