Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Concentrix Solutions Corporation

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided June 3, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00661Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MARK B. CUNNINGHAM, § § Plaintiff § Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-00661 § Judge Mazzant v. § § CONCENTRIX SOLUTIONS § CORPORATION, formerly known as § CONCENTRIX CORPORATION, § § Defendant § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motions to Quash or Alternatively to Modify Subpoena and Objections to Subpoena (Dkt. #45; Dkt. #46). The motions raise similar objections to virtually identical subpoenas sent to Xerox Corporation and Conduent Inc. Having considered the Motions, the Court finds they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Williams v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API