Cunningham v. Concentrix Solutions Corporation
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MARK B. CUNNINGHAM, § § Plaintiff § Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-00661 § Judge Mazzant v. § § CONCENTRIX SOLUTIONS § CORPORATION, formerly known as § CONCENTRIX CORPORATION, § § Defendant § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motions to Quash or Alternatively to Modify Subpoena and Objections to Subpoena (Dkt. #45; Dkt. #46). The motions raise similar objections to virtually identical subpoenas sent to Xerox Corporation and Conduent Inc. Having considered the Motions, the Court finds they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Williams v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.