Morgan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition from this Court barring the respondents from entertaining further proceedings under Rule VI. The central issue is whether notice of intent to appeal in open court at the time of the ruling or order of the magistrate is essential to the invocation of Rule VI review by the State. Upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, and the presentations at oral argument, we conclude that the writ should be granted.
Petitioner, Phil Morgan, was charged in Cleveland County District Court, Case No. CRF-83-570, with Unlawful Disposal of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- Carlile v. National Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- People v. BomarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lampe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Chase v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Walker v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991