Legal Opinion

Chupka v. Saunders

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1986No. 85-1878PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Chupka asserts that the court of appeals erred in its refusal to remand the cause to the court of common pleas for a trial due novo following the discovery that the court of common pleas had ruled on an incomplete record. We agree.

Administrative and judicial review of the suspension, demotion or removal of a police officer must be conducted pursuant to R.C. 124.34, which provides in pertinent part:

“In the case of the suspension * * * or removal of * * * any member of the police or fire department of a city or civil service township, * * * [a]n appeal on questions of law and fact may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lincoln Properties, Inc. v. GoldslagerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re LockeOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Newsome v. Municipal Civil Service Commission of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Carey v. CareyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Hall v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Shaffer v. Village of West FarmingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Westlake Civil Service Commission v. PietrickOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Beyersdoerfer v. ShocketOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API