Trumpler v. Royer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtChittenden, J.
This case originated in the Probate Court upon an application by Royer & *152Spitler for an allowance of attorney fees, for services rendered in defending the will of Emma R. Slusser, deceased, in a contest suit. The Probate Court, upon the evidence introduced in that court, allowed the attorneys for their services the sum of $400. An appeal was prosecuted by Royer & Spitler to the Court of Common Pleas, and upon trial in that court an allowance was made to them of $2,000. From this judgment error is prosecuted to this court.
In the Court of Common Pleas it was stipulated that the testimony taken…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. John v. LoflandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1903
- Dunne v. DeerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Redden v. InmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abdul-Kabir v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Totten v. Estate of MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- United States v. Donte JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- State v. WestfallOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- Arrow Aluminum Castings Co. v. Thor Mold & MacHine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.