Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 13, 1937No. 8361Published
1Opinion of the Court
94 F.2d 138 (1937)
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
CARLISLE LUMBER CO.
No. 8361.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 13, 1937.
Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Senior Litigation Atty., and Philip Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Theodore B. Bruener, of Aberdeen, Wash., and Charles H. Paul, of Seattle, Wash., for respondent Carlisle Lumber Co.
C. D. Cunningham, of Centralia, Wash., for Associated Employees of Onalaska, Inc.
Before WILBUR, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
HANEY,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.