Legal Opinion

State v. Shaffer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1951No. 32334Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

A boxlike contrivance with machinery inside and a lever to operate it, which is “played” by dropping coins in a slot and pulling the lever, the person playing it winning or not, depending on the manner in which the inside mechanism performs, and which is designed for the purpose of gambling is “a gambling device or machine” per se and comes within the purview , of Section 13066, General Code. See Kraus v. City of Cleveland, 135 Ohio St., 43, 45, 19 N. E. (2d), 159, 160.

The state’s evidence herein shows that the instrument involved was in a conspicuous and accessible location in defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. KraussOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In Re Estate of WeisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API