Legal Opinion
Knollman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1954No. 11969_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated eases three contiguous parcels of land aggregating over 450 acres situated in Crosby Township, Hamilton County, Ohio, some eight miles northwest of the corporation line of Cincinnati, were sought to be taken in condemnation by the government. The following sums estimated to be due as just compensation were deposited in court by the government: $53,250 to defendants 1 Fuchs; $65,000 to defendants Irwin; and $72,000 to defendant Knollman. The jury in separate verdicts awarded " $39,448 to' defendants Fuchs, $60,643 to defendants Irwin, and $51,993 to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Hays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easement & Right of WayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- State Highway Commission v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- United States v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.