Legal Opinion
Carlock v. Kusin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1936No. 5262PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
The material averments of the original petition in this case may be paraphrased as follows: On or about June 25, 1934, while plaintiff was employed regularly by the Supreme Bedding Company, defendant Kusin offered her employment in his factory, the Dixie Bedding Company, stating at the time, “that if she would enter his employ, he would guarantee her a full time position for forever and so long as she should live.” After due consideration, she accepted defendant’s offer.
On or about July 2, 1934, plaintiff entered the employ of defendant at a weekly wage of $12, and received a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Wolf v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Nelson v. Continental Asphalt & Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Southern Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richland State Bank v. BrockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Noel Estate, Inc. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. of St. PaulLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Rockefeller v. EgglestonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- H. A. Bauman, Inc. v. TillyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937