Legal Opinion

United States v. Graham

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 10, 1954No. 4905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

A divided board of review affirmed the accused’s conviction for desertion with the intent to remain away permanently, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 679. We granted review to determine whether the accused was prejudiced by the admission of certain evidence intended to show his intent.

Six extracts of entries in the accused’s service record constitute the prosecution’s direct case. Three of these, admitted in evidence without objection, show that at 5:00 a.m. on May 13, 1953, the accused failed to return…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. DellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. YergerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. ValenciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. O'NeilUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SellersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  2. United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. VintressUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. DawkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. RenshawUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API